Quadro Rtx 4000 Vs Rtx 2060
Price now 332$ Games supported 99% Price now 2471$ Games supported 100% Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other full general parameters. Value for money To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices. General performance parameters such equally number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing procedure, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment y'all have to consider their criterion and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing ane. For desktop video cards it'due south interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), boosted power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of retentivity installed: its blazon, size, omnibus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors accept no dedicated VRAM and employ a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this department is precise but for desktop reference ones (and so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information volition prove useful if y'all need some particular technology for your purposes. APIs supported, including detail versions of those APIs. Non-gaming benchmark operation comparing. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. Nosotros are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you discover some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments department, we unremarkably fix problems apace. This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing iv separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, eleven and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Criterion coverage: 25% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from eleven different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU'due south processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: nine% Geekbench five is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: five% Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics menu benchmark combined from eleven different examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: v% Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the boilerplate frames per second in a large set of popular games beyond dissimilar resolutions: Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical Urban center recommends NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 since it shows meliorate performance. Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop card while Quadro RTX 4000 is a workstation one. Should y'all withal have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and nosotros shall answer. Practise yous think nosotros are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics menu. The nearest GeForce RTX 2060's AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6600, which is faster by 1% and higher by 2 positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2060: We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 4000 from AMD is Radeon Pro W5700, which is slower by 3% and lower past 4 positions in our rating. Hither are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 4000: We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more than options to consider. Hither you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, every bit well equally charge per unit them yourself. Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 on a calibration of 1 to 5: Rate NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5: Here y'all can enquire a question about this comparing, concur or disagree with our judgements, or report an mistake or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSGeForce RTX 2060 vs Quadro RTX 4000
General info
Place in functioning rating 84 63 Value for coin 47.72 ix.99 Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Turing (2018−2021) GPU code name Turing TU106 TU104 Market segment Desktop Workstation Release date vi January 2019 (3 years agone) thirteen November 2018 (3 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $349 $899 Current price $332 (1x MSRP) $2471 (2.7x MSRP) Technical specs
Pipelines / CUDA cores 1920 2304 Core clock speed 1320 MHz 1005 MHz Boost clock speed 1620 MHz 1545 MHz Number of transistors 10,800 million thirteen,600 1000000 Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm Thermal design power (TDP) 175 Watt 160 Watt Texture fill up rate 201.half-dozen 222.five Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe iii.0 x16 Length 229 mm 241 mm Width two-slot 1-slot Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin 1x 8-pin Memory
Retentiveness type GDDR6 GDDR6 Maximum RAM corporeality 6 GB 8 GB Memory motorbus width 192 Bit 256 Scrap Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 13000 MHz Memory bandwidth 336.0 GB/south 416.0 GB/s Shared retentivity - no data Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Blazon-C HDMI + no data G-SYNC support + no data Technologies
API back up
DirectX 12 12 Ultimate (12_1) Shader Model 6.5 half-dozen.five OpenGL 4.6 four.half dozen OpenCL ane.2 1.ii Vulkan one.2.131 i.two.131 CUDA 7.five seven.five Benchmark operation
Overall score
Gaming performance
Full HD 120 no data 1440p 76 no data 4K l no information
Low Preset
Medium Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
High Preset
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no information
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92 no information Assassinator's Creed Valhalla 79 no information Battleground 5 145 no data Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 135 no information Cyberpunk 2077 45−fifty no data Far Cry 5 103 no data Far Cry New Dawn 101 no data Forza Horizon 4 140 no data Hitman iii 45−50 no information Horizon Zero Dawn 101 no data Red Dead Redemption two 102 no information Shadow of the Tomb Raider 107 no data Watch Dogs: Legion 101 no data
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 78 no data Assassin'south Creed Valhalla 64 no data Battlefield 5 129 no data Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118 no data Cyberpunk 2077 45−fifty no data Far Weep 5 99 no data Far Weep New Dawn 97 no data Forza Horizon 4 131 no data Hitman 3 45−50 no data Horizon Aught Dawn 78 no data Metro Exodus 67 no information Ruby Dead Redemption 2 56 no information Shadow of the Tomb Raider 96 no information The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 136 no data Sentinel Dogs: Legion 87 no data
Assassinator's Creed Odyssey 56 no data Assassinator'southward Creed Valhalla 55 no data Battlefield five 119 no data Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data Far Cry 5 94 no data Far Weep New Dawn 88 no data Forza Horizon four 105 no data The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73 no data Watch Dogs: Legion 45 no data
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 76 no data Hitman 3 45−50 no data Horizon Zero Dawn 52 no data Metro Exodus 42 no data Ruby Dead Redemption 2 35 no data Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50 no data
Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 45−50 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42 no data Battlefield five 45−fifty no information Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data Far Cry 5 45−50 no data Far Weep New Dawn 76 no data Forza Horizon iv 45−50 no information Watch Dogs: Legion 30 no information
Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 43 no information Hitman 3 45−50 no data Horizon Cipher Dawn xxx no data Metro Exodus 26 no data Red Dead Redemption ii 24 no data Shadow of the Tomb Raider 32 no data The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51 no data
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28 no data Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24 no data Battlefield 5 53 no data Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no information Far Cry v 41 no data Far Cry New Dawn 42 no data Forza Horizon 4 59 no information Watch Dogs: Legion 17 no information Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 47.07 52.19 Novelty 6 January 2019 13 November 2018 Toll $349 $899 Retention bus width 192 256 Pipelines / CUDA cores 1920 2304 Memory bandwidth 336 416 Thermal blueprint power (TDP) 175 Watt 160 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2060 past AMD
Competitors of Quadro RTX 4000 by AMD
Like GPU comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2060-vs-Quadro-RTX-4000
Posted by: leewertiout.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Quadro Rtx 4000 Vs Rtx 2060"
Post a Comment